SAT • QUESTION & ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT

A good wrong answer should tell me why the student was wrong.

I develop SAT-style practice with difficulty, variation and distractor behavior in mind. The goal is not to make questions look strange. It is to prevent students from succeeding only because they recognize a template.

3Complete 22-question modules
66Questions across those modules
6Selected portfolio samples
2Target uses: tutoring + question work

BUILDING A MODULE

Twenty-two acceptable questions can still make a bad module.

I check the set as a whole, not only the individual questions.

I look for repeated structures, overused solution methods, weak distractors and difficulty that comes from unnecessary calculation rather than reasoning. I solve every question myself and revise questions when they feel too similar to material already used.

DIFFICULTY
PROBLEM STRUCTURE
FULL SOLUTION
LIKELY MISTAKES
DISTRACTORS
REVIEW / REVISE

THE DISTRACTOR LAB

Random wrong numbers waste information.

Where possible, each wrong option is built from a mistake I can realistically imagine a student making.

SIGN ERRORCorrect setup, wrong sign
WRONG FORMULAFamiliar rule applied in the wrong situation
STOPS EARLYIntermediate value selected as final answer
WRONG QUANTITYSolves for x when the question asks for 2x
ARITHMETIC SLIPConcept is right, calculation is not
MISREADS CONDITIONReasonable mathematics applied to the wrong interpretation

SAT-STYLE QUESTIONS I DEVELOPED

Six samples selected for range, not just difficulty.

These are self-developed practice questions written to reflect Digital SAT Math content and reasoning. They are not College Board questions.

DIFFICULTY PHILOSOPHY

The mathematics should remain SAT mathematics. The challenge should come from what the student has to notice.

NOT HARD

Ugly numbers

Long arithmetic does not automatically create meaningful difficulty.

NOT HARD

Unnecessary steps

A problem can be tedious without requiring stronger reasoning.

USEFUL HARD

Connected ideas

Difficulty becomes useful when familiar concepts must be recognized and combined in an unfamiliar arrangement.

HOW I EXPLAIN

One question. More than one way in.

These are examples of my worked explanations for students. The underlying practice questions in this section are not presented as questions I authored.

PARABOLA

Structure, algebra and Desmos

I use roots, vertex symmetry, coefficient relationships and graphing/regression when they genuinely offer different routes to the same result.

STATISTICS

Extreme possible means

I break histogram interval problems into lower and upper possible values so students can see why the maximum or minimum difference occurs.

RECTANGULAR PRISMS

Visualize before calculating

The systematic surface-area method is followed by the shorter observation: two original surface areas minus the two glued faces that disappear inside.

TEACHING MATERIALS

Questions are only one part of the preparation system.

I have also developed study notes, formula sheets, worksheets, mock and diagnostic material, solution manuals and recorded explanation videos.

The material is designed to support the same sequence I use in teaching: understand the concept, diagnose the mistake, build reliability and then reduce the time.